Prediction of Mathys Erhard [281st] vs Muni Ananth Mani [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W L W W W L
Form
W W L W W L W L W LH2H: Erhard 1 - 0 Mani
They have played 2 sets in total, with Erhard winning 2 and Mani winning 0. The last match between Erhard and Mani was at the M25 Brazzaville, 01-08-2024, Second, Clay with Mathys Erhard getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mathys Erhard | 1 |
| Muni Ananth Mani | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-0 |
Stats 
Mathys Erhard
Player
Muni Ananth Mani
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 0 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:49:0 | Average Match Time | 0:49:0 |
| 65% (24/37) | 1st Serve % | 52% (25/48) |
| 83% (20/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (11/25) |
| 54% (7/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (6/23) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 65% (31/48) | Return Points Win % | 27% (10/37) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mathys Erhard vs Muni Ananth Mani Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Erhard 1 - 0 Mani
Editorial Prediction:
Mathys Erhard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Mitchell Krueger
67%
(
85 of
127)
1st Serve %
66%
(
84 of
127)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
57 of
84)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
46 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
46 of
127)
127
Total Points Won
127
|
4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Patrick Maloney
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
4
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
5
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Karl Poling
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
112)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Mathys Erhard
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Murphy Cassone
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Mathys Erhard
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
82 of
117)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
9 of
24)
Break Points Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
53%
(
54 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
64 of
117)
111
Total Points Won
107
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Carlos Lopez Montagud
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
56
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Mathys Erhard
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Muni Ananth Mani Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Priyanshu Choudhary
Player
Muni Ananth Mani
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yuvan Nandal
Player
Muni Ananth Mani
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
6
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Muni Ananth Mani
Player
Manish Ganesh
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
76)
3
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raghav Jaisinghani
Player
Muni Ananth Mani
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Muni Ananth Mani
Player
Abhinansu Borthakur
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
3
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
0
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
34 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
54
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 0-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kiruthik Kalyaan As
Player
Muni Ananth Mani
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Muni Ananth Mani
Player
Juan Jose Bianchi
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
90)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
6-7(5) 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Muni Ananth Mani
Player
Raymond Oduor
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (239/148) | Win/Loss | 48% (19/21) |
| 60% (534/360) | Sets Win/Loss | 46% (41/49) |
| 54% (4578/3852) | Games Win/Loss | 47% (414/458) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 808 | Aces Total | 35 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 914 | Total Double Faults | 75 |
| 1:30:9 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 421.59 | Average Opponent Rank | 45.38 |
| 65% (14343/21959) | 1st Serve % | 55% (655/1191) |
| 67% (9542/14343) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (423/655) |
| 49% (3764/7615) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (235/536) |
| 45% (1184/2615) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (48/117) |
| 43% (9748/22507) | Return Points Win % | 40% (466/1173) |
| 62% (235/380) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (19/40) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (53/91) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 53% (64/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 70% (7/10) |
| 88% (229/202) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (16/14) |
| 11% (229/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (16/2) |
| 23% (158/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (24/5) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mathys Erhard
View full predicted draw for Erhard
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
